Last Updated on April 20, 2024 by pg@petergamma.org
Why does BrainFlow developer Andrey Parfenov from Moscow re-write code from EEG devices into new EEG toolbox with a new label which is called BrainFlow?
Why does not do something which makes more sense, for instance building an Adarfuit Pyloton BLE Bike computer:
No, no, Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org is only joking. But Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org supposes that he has triggered the Pyloton Bluetooth Bike Computer.
since he he has written so many post about ANT+ and BLE on www.petergamma.org., altough he is not interested in building bike computers at all.
But did Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org not bring more clarity into PPG devices? He has written 358 posts about PPG:
https://petergamma.org/category/optical-heart-rate-sensor
Does this make him not a kind of an expert about PPG? And he knows now that only view scientist use PPG for science.
So we invite Andrey Parfenov from Moscow to make something which makes more sense than building an Adafruit Pyloton Bike computer as a computer scientist from Moscow. And we invite Andrey Parfenov to help Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org to build an EEG device which is similarly revolutionary to the Adafruit Pyloton to make EEG devices up to 50 000 USD obsolete:
And let go of developing BrainFlow. Since will BrainFlow not be obsolete as well, if we one day will have a EEG device with 32 channels and InfluxDB for a view thousand dollars sooner or later, which will replace all the EEG devices in BrainFlow?