Last Updated on December 29, 2025 by pg@petergamma.org
The scientist Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org heavily critizised Rob ter Horst, for instance for his statements about the «Polar H10 as the gold standard in science»:
Peter reviewed what he knows about this topic:
But Rob ter Horst basically does not change. For instance he continues to claim that the Polar H10 has been tested in many scientific studies (at 23 min in the following video at the end):
But these scientific studies are not convincing for us personally. Since these studies are not done systematically and are repeated with newer devices on a regular basis. And does this not mean that the results of these (promo?) papers where not reproduced? Not reproduced, since these results are not reproducable? And who wants to invest such a lot of time to falsify Rob ter Horst?
And does Rob ter Horst not have any time in the world to sell us smartwatches?