Last Updated on April 11, 2024 by pg@petergamma.org
Rob ter Horst scientifically tested the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 against a Polar H10 chest strap for 70 USD:
But are Rob ter Horst’s scientific tests not an outdated concept if we look at this?:
To you have access to scientific testing equipment at the highest level such as a Schiller C200 ECG treadmill for 23 000 USD?:
We invite you to repeat Rob ter Horst’s Scientific Review of the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 according to the following procedure. In 2019, Cardiologist Milind Desai from the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio:
published a paper with scientific smartwatch studies at the highest level:
Accuracy of commercially available heart rate monitors in athletes: a prospective study
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732081
Milind Desai tested in this paper smartwatches against an ECG treadmill for runs up to about 15 km/h. This is the testing procedure with the highest accuracy which is available at the present day as far as we know. You do not trust Rob ter Horst’s Scientific Review of the Samsung Galaxy Fit3?
Test this smartwatch according to the procedure described above, and publish your results on YouTube as a second opinion to Rob ter Horst’s results. We are happy to hear for you.
Are your critical comments about Rob ter Horst’s scientific tests deleted from Rob’s YouTube channel? We invite you to post critical comments about his scientific reviews in the comments below.