Last Updated on October 2, 2022 by pg@petergamma.org
Rob ter Horst often mentions in his reviews on YouTube that his Polar H10 is an ECG device
- but is it the most accurate ECG device for this purpose?
The group of the cardiologist Milind Y. Desai used for their study the Q-Tel RMS:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732081/
- We did not check all the details of these devices. They can be bought on ebay for around 8000 USD:
- These device have multiple components. Let us request a quote from Q-Tel RMS if we want to buy one:
- and these are as we know not for mobile use, as we can see here on this picture:
- Another study with the Polar OH1:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217288
used a
g.Nautilus MULTI PURPOSE ECG device
- They have an A/D resolution of 24 bit:
- We did not request a quote at g.Nautilus, whe just quick & dirty used the product configuratior of g.tec medical to see which product could fit best:
Wearable Amplifier g.Nautilus Multi-Purpose 8 Channel g.SAHARA
€ 4.990,00
Software g.Recorder Professional € 2.655,00
TOTAL € 7.990,00
- g.Tec multipurpose has 24 bit A/D resolution
The Schiller Medilog AR12 Plus Holter Recorder
used by the Swiss Federal Institute of Sports Magglingen used to test the Polar H10 has an A/D resolution of 12 bit. This is the same resolution Bitalino ECG for 200 USD has.
- For doing research, 16 bit devices at a minimum are used according to the Bitalino support. An information whe received from the Bitalino support at a time, where it was still possible to reach the Bitalino support.