Last Updated on August 27, 2024 by pg@petergamma.org
PiEEG could be a successor of OpenBCI. But currently is it more than a pipe detonator? PiEEG is available, but hardly anyone seems to buy it:
https://www.elecrow.com/pieeg.html?srsltid=AfmBOooLm1wD0i5itcBgiKL9dL8LyhvXyV2ZDVcP0BGWgzSHdehi_j15
Was it tested many times and send back to Elecrow? And a PiEEG forum is also available, but hardly used:
https://pieeg.com/forum-pieeg-low-cost-brain-computer-interface
In the example of OpenBCI Cyton we can see how long it takes that a product is at the level so that it is no longer criticized by developers at the university level such as Fieldtrip developer Robert Oostenveld:
It did not happen yet that Robert Oostenveld stopped critizising OpenBCI Cyton. But Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org thinks now all the information is here to make out of it a device which works without issues.
And now PiEEG is on the market. But who buys PiEEG if we read what William Croft from www.openbci.com writes about it?
Aren t countless devices sold on YouTube which have countless issues? Is not PiEEG one of those? But would it be not an easy job for a skilled soft- and hardware tester to make tests with PiEEG and how to resolve the issues? In the example of the OpenBCI WIFI shield, we can see what someone like alwayswearshats can do, and that is to save the OpenBCI WIFI shield:
So who buys PiEEG without an alwayswearshats who makes detailed tests and shows how to get PiEEG running? Therefore it is highly desirable that someone like alwayswearshats makes detailed tests about PiEEG, the issues, and how to resolve those, especially the issues with noise.
Comments are closed.