Last Updated on December 28, 2023 by pg@petergamma.org
Are not some YouTube video makers supported by public fonds or social insurance supports in one way or the other? If so should they not contribute to the service public in one way or the other?
But do some of these YouTube video makers not in reality test and promote outdated devices to be able to sell those at top prices?
Outdated in a sense that these devcies where previously tested by scientists and medical doctors with the result that these are only of limited use for scientific and medical applications?
But then they are tested and promoted on YouTube by scientists and medical doctors who are eventually partly supported by public fonds or social insurance funds?
Are we manipulated by those scientists and medical doctors?
And do not some YouTube video makers spread untruths in that sense that they claim to promote «the best devices» which they are not from a scientific or medical point of view?
Should these YouTube video makers not be obliged to adhere to some ethical standards?
What is your opininion about this topicwrite it in the comments below?