Last Updated on January 26, 2023 by pg@petergamma.org
We are happy that Robert Oostenveld reviewed the gtec Unicorn Black. Unfortunately, his review is only published on his personal website, and not in a peer-reviewed scientific paper. This makes the Unicorn Black less suitable to be used for scientific studies.
We sometimes ask ourselves, if there is some kind of a strategy behind it. That the g.tec medical Unicorn Black is less suitable to be used for scientific studies by this fact. And this serves primarily g.tec medical, so that we have to buy more expensive devices which have already proofen to be suitable for scientific purposes.
It seems to us that there are marketing strategists behind many strange things who want to control the market. This makes these devices less interesting for us personally, since we are interested in low-cost high-quality devices, and not in manufacturers who have the goal to keep the costs for their devices high. Also Scott Harden, PhD., DMD., offers us an ECG device, unfortunately it is only a sound-card ECG device on his personal website, and not a test which is published in a high quality scientific paper. These facts make the device less suitable for scientific studies.