Last Updated on August 24, 2023 by pg@petergamma.org
The high accuracy of the Cyton gold standard 3 channel ECG device has been previously shown in a paper:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021012512
But Rob ter Horst refuses to test this great device. Rob also selectively reviews one paper which compares a Holter ECG against a Polar H10 chest strap.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31004219/
But Rob ignores and does not mention other very interesting papers who use highly accurate devices, as for instance a paper written by cardiologists of the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732081/
- Rob does not mention and test expensive and highly accurate devices.
- What are exactly the criteria for the selection of his devices?
- Which scientist selects a paper with an ECG device which cannot handle with noisy ECG signals which compares it to a Polar H10, and ignores the other papers?
- Which scientist specifially does not test highly accurate ECG devices?
- Which scientist selects only those which are not in the champions league?
- Which scientiest shows only plots of selected devices, and want to convince us with these plots that Apple watches are the most accurate ones?
- Which scientist who wants to be taken serious does all of this?
- Is Rob not rather controlled by business scientists who want to manipulate us to buy smartwatches who select for him what he is allowed to test and to show?
So is Rob not rather a smartwatch seller who manipulates us than a scientist who wants to find out the truth? What is your opinion about this topic? Write it in the comments below: