Last Updated on February 4, 2024 by pg@petergamma.org
Who takes an EEG device developer like Ildar Rakhmatulin serious who writes papers about how to develop Raspberry Pi’s for Killing Mosquitoes by Laser:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3772579
Eventually leepspvideo. But unfortunately leepspvideo is in danger as well. Because if Raspberry Pi goes to the stocks, could this not kill Raspberry Pi for private users and as a consequence kill leepspvideo as well? leepspvideo does not help to save PiEEG, he did not even make a YouTube video about PiEEG, altough we kindly asked him to do so. Leepspvideo seem to prefer to make videos about Pimiga 4, the ultimate Amiga experience with a Raspberry Pi:
The Commodore Amiga (Spanish amiga ‘girlfriend’) was a widely used line of computers from the 1980s to the 1990s. But who is interested in the Amiga PC in the year 2024? Leepspvideo seem to offer no help to save PiEEG, so how else can we safe it? We can port it for instance to the Orange Pi, would this not be the safer platform than Raspberry Pi? To save PiEEG so that it does not dissapear before Pi EEG 8 channel has been launched, dissapear in the same way as Adam Feurer’s HackEEG has dissapeared:
How can this problem be solved? We suggest that for instance the Neurokit2 authors write a new paper and pick up PiEEG in it:
https://github.com/neuropsychology/NeuroKit
So that also really serious scientists use PiEEG to write papers with it so that PiEEG does not disappear from the market.
But are the Neurokit authors really serious scientist?
In the disclaimer in the Neurokit2 GITHUB it says:
“The authors do not provide any warranty. If this software causes your keyboard to blow up, your brain to liquefy, your toilet to clog or a zombie plague to break loose, the authors CANNOT IN ANY WAY be held responsible.“
So we do not know if the Neurokit2 authors are really serious scientists either, and if Neurokit2 is buggy or not.