Should YouTube video makers which are partly supported by public fonds or social insurance supports not contribute in one way or the other to the service public and be obliged to adhere to some ethical standards?

Are not some YouTube video makers supported by public fonds or social insurance supports in one way or the other? If so should they not contribute to the service public in one way or the other? But do some of these YouTube video makers not in reality test and promote outdated devices to be able …