And what is the conclusion of Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org?

Last Updated on February 21, 2025 by pg@petergamma.org

What has become out of Matthieu Ricard s Buddhist monks with the extraordinary brain waves of high-level meditators 20 years after the PNAS paper from 2004?

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0407401101

Peter says:

Here you get back the crap

you taught us during the last 20 years.

Starting from

Matthieu Ricard „Happiness“

To Richard R. Davidson „Altered Traits“

Are books of authors who teach something which they do not live by themselves not just crap? And are teachings of people who teach a way of living which is not open and transparently funded and cannot be reproduced by anyone not just crap as well? Or crap of rich people who are not open and transparent?

Peter Gamma is looking for guiding stars like Ajahn Chah and Milarepa in Switzerland which are open and transparently funded and are available for everyone. But he still has not found what he is looking for.

And is not also crap, the contradictory information of psychotherapists in Switzerland:

A parody about experiences of patients who where treated with psychotherapy on the long-term in Switzerland

and the information which contradicts to this from Pro Infirmis?

What has become out of the vision of the Dalai Lama the 14 & his meditation research project?

And are both information from the social insurance companies? Since this is all about problems which have not been yet processed by the society in Switzerland?