EEG devices which are voted out by Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org

Last Updated on January 17, 2025 by pg@petergamma.org

1. Neurosity

Does this EEG device not have the most ugliest name of an EEG device in the word?

Is Neurosity Crown is furthermore not the leader for the ugliest advertisement in the world?

2. mBrainTrain

Who buys an EEG device with such a strange name?

3. smartingmobi

It is not clear for us personally what smartingmobi has to do with mBrainTrain an how they relate to each other.

4. Soterix Medical

The confusion becomes even bigger with that label. What has it to do with SMARTING mobi or mBrainTrain?

This magic little box seems to have it all. It has the mBrainTrain logo, and the mBrainTrain.com label. Furthermore it has another label which is called “SMARTING”. But what have these labels to do with each other? Smarting mobi furthermore can be found on the Soterix Medical website. Who can see through all of these confusing labels?

Not Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org

5. Muse

who buys an EEG device which such a name?

6. And the most beautiful name for an EEG is “OpenBCI Galea”

What does galea mean? In Latin it means ” leather helmet”.
Its etymology stems from the Latin words galea and gala, meaning leather helmet and weasel or marten, respectively. The fusion of these two distinct meanings presents an intriguing narrative of the name’s origins. In ancient history, the leather helmet symbolized protection and valor among Roman warriors.

But who spents 25 000 USD for this ” leather helmet”?

7. OpenBCI

Who buys an EEG device for 2 000 USD from a company who is not even capable of reparing the Wifi shield? And as a consequence, the device is as slow as a Citroën Deux Chevaux?

8. g.tec medical multi-purpose headset

The amplifiers for 32 channels for this device are 20 000 USD. But who buys anyway EEG devices from a company who names their devices “Unicorn Black”?”

For these reasons, all of these EEG devices are voted out by Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org.

And was all of this done on request of a marketing trust of EEG device sellers to keep the prices for those high, so that those in the lower price segment do not compete with the ones in the higher segment? And is this not another clear evidence of a violation of competition laws in the US, EU, UK, China, Canada & Switzerland?