090d. Why Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org does not know if the scientific data of Rob ter Horsts more than 100 smartwatch accuracy tests nor the scientific data in accuracy validation papers about consumer grade heart rate monitors will be reproduced convincingly by other scientists?

A key scientific paper in this context is this one: Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989 ;45:255-68. 10.2307/2532051 This paper has been cited 8580 times to this date: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=A+Concordance+Correlation+Coefficient+to+Evaluate+Reproducibility&btnG= Why has this paper been so often cited? It is a key paper which say something about what is required so … Continue reading 090d. Why Peter Gamma from www.petergamma.org does not know if the scientific data of Rob ter Horsts more than 100 smartwatch accuracy tests nor the scientific data in accuracy validation papers about consumer grade heart rate monitors will be reproduced convincingly by other scientists?